Review Birdsong: A Novel of Love
and War
If you want to read a gripping,
graphic account of World War I soldiering in the tunnels and trenches of
northern France, Sebastian Faulks’ Birdsong
is your book. If you want to read a love story framed around World War I, skip Birdsong. Its subtitle, A Novel of Love and War, is a bit
misleading as the novel is light on the love part. A more apt, though clunkier,
subtitle could be a novel of attempted love
numbed by war.
At various points, Faulks mentions
birds to thread this theme through Birdsong,
for example, “In the wonderful quiet, when the German guns had stopped, they
heard the song of a blackbird.” Perhaps he means to imply that main character
Stephen Wraysford’s ability to love takes flight or sings like a bird after the
war. In my opinion, this symbolic bird never leaves the nest. Wraysford tries
to love, but seems unable due to a vacuum of love in his childhood and then the
horrors of war. He remains a grounded dodo bird.
Although I don’t see birdsong as
metaphor for love here, I can see—but only with camo-covered field
binoculars—how love fits in the subtitle. It’s not in a traditional, romantic
sense. This novel shows love’s imperfection, and then on top of that, what a
mess we make of love, including fighting battles that steal any hope that love
is even possible. Faulks gives us a contrast of war’s inhumane coldness and the
passion/security he calls love. He also gives us wildly contrasting views of
intensity: sexual passion and unthinkable atrocities. One is doing everything
that feels good; the other is doing nothing that feels good—and in my opinion, Faulks
presents both as immoral.
Birdsong is not a book I like. It is a book
I respect, however. Faulks starts the pages crackling with passion of two young
lovers in 1910 and ends them in 1979 with flat facts bequeathed to subsequent
generations by the lovers’ destructive betrayals. In between, he bloodies the
pages with graphic World War I live action. Stephen Wraysford, the character
linking 1910 with 1979, seems a joyless drifter from beginning to end. Nearly
all 483 pages are about him; yet I did not sense I ever knew him, despite
having read many of his emotional responses to both love and war actions in the
novel. I found it hard to care, even when war seemed to develop his conscience
and mature his view of love.
What seems more like the main
character in this novel is the war itself. In much the same way that Tim
O’Brien’s July, July reunion account
lapses into vivid Vietnam War flashbacks, nonwar parts of the Birdsong story seem but vehicles to
shout, “War is hell.” And Faulks powerfully communicates this message with
graphic details of war strategies and failed plans, soldiers’ grisly injuries
and deaths, and soldiers’ emotional coping mechanisms.
Strategies like using tunnels and
trenches were educational for me. Reading about limbs being blown off and much
worse was extremely difficult for me. At times I had to turn away. (Maybe that
was the point.) And then the wartime narrative dragged tediously on and on.
(Another point, since the war rumored be over any battle now lasted four years?)
Learning about men’s emotions in the midst of this unthinkably inhumane saga
was what changed me.
My ancestors who saw World War I
action are gone, but now I have an inkling why my father and a former boss, who
both saw World War II action, teared up and could not talk about their
experiences. I want to cry just thinking about the horror they’ve held inside
all these years if they have seen even half of what Stephen Wraysford saw. He
never really recovered from that war. My father and employer, however,
soldiered bravely on in civilian life to overcome and become productive,
positive, well-rounded, generously loving men. I appreciate what they overcame
to accomplish this even more now that I’ve read this novel.
That I appreciated this book
without liking it is to Faulks’ credit. His portrayal of the men’s brave
perseverance through war’s horrors is inspiring. Soldiers braced themselves for
death at any time, whether entering a tunnel, crouching in a trench, or running
into shell fire toward German barbed wire. I felt claustrophobic just reading
about being in the tunnels. So many exploded and collapsed, burying alive many
of the novel’s characters. I also found the soldiers’ disciplined obedience
interesting. Unless I missed it, no soldier spoke of World War I’s big picture
or international politics. There seemed no overarching, grand philosophical purpose
for their sacrifices—just uncompromising obedience to military superiors. Their
country had entered this war; that was reason enough to fight.
I was touched by the loneliness
enforced by the delicate balance of bonding with men you knew might die any
moment. One recurring emotion was the isolation soldiers felt when their loved
ones could not understand war horrors. They wanted to shake the numbness—maybe
talking about it would help—but they learned no one wanted to listen, and
furthermore, how could they understand?
You might be able to understand
better after reading Birdsong.
No comments:
Post a Comment